SA CITY GOVERNMENT

LIGHTNING EXLUSIVE
An Enemy Of The State
RG Griffing - SAL Commentary Series - Part 2 - Copyright 2012 By SAL

This is a story about San Antonio city government's use of municipal huff and puff, and bluster and blunder, to intimidate and deprive at least one citizen of his rights.

It's probably an example of illegal intimidation, too.

To wit:

Title 18, USC., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law

This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the US.

This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on account of such person being an alien or by reason ofhis/her color or race.

Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts ofany official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors, Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes ordinances, or customs. (Emphasis added.)

Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

* * *

When contacted by RG Griffing, Anita Ramirez of Chief McManus office said this letter does not exist. When told Griffing was a reporter she became angered, Which begs the question -- do media get a different answer than mere citizens?

* * *

As noted in this space on more than one occasion, there are serious questions about the 911 emergency services supposed to be provided by the city of San Antonio.

Recently the Express-News shed some light on this.

Top SAPD and city information technology leaders acknowledged problems but said they were being resolved. They denied there was widespread discontent with the system. In no way does it compromise public safety or endanger officers, and to suggest such a thing is irresponsible, they said.

But the reviews from those who use it have been less than stellar.

“If this were the private sector, heads would have rolled months ago,” one officer said. Another cited as a recent example a check run on a man's name to see if he had any arrest warrants. The new system showed none. But the old mainframe, which still can be used, revealed he was wanted on a weapons charge.

Officers “can't even do the basic things,” police union President Mike Helle said, adding that most officers are beyond frustrated at the system's lack of operability.
The Express (Click for full story.)

At least two police insiders believe Chief McManus and Michael Bernard are retaliating for Foddrill's accusations of fraud and theft. Those same insiders say they have seen documentation supporting Foddrill. Others say McManus quietly passed the word not to speak to or about Foddrill. Bernard has used the same tactic on city workers.

Meanwhile, the Chief and City attorney have issued an edict banning Foddrill from the city for no stated purpose. Then they sent armed policemen to Foddrills home on the night of July 4th.

Police have ignored documented threats against Foddrill. and an assault against an involved party.

Why?

More To Follow.

- Developing -

Former City Communications Director Blasts Express-News

 

SAL, San Antonio Lightning Newspaper, SanAntonioLightning.Com
And SALSA Connection Are Trademarks And Services Marks
All Rights Reserved
Copyright 1999-2012 RG Griffing Publications

h